Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crab puff

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination is based on flawed assumption (non-admin closure) AutomaticStrikeout (T • C • AAPT) 16:49, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Crab puff[edit]

Crab puff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is already an article Crab rangoon, which is the exact same thing with a different name. GabeMc (talk|contribs) 01:01, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • I would say merge, but there's really nothing to merge. Delete Go Phightins! 01:07, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'Redirect'Keep to Crab rangoon and everyone's happy. - MrX 03:27, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Changed to keep, per addtional sources and clarification of the difference between a crab puff and a crab rangoon. - MrX 12:48, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Keep: Disruptive nomination, user has slapped a tag of some sort on over a dozen pages I created or significantly edited in the page pbp 06:05, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Two sentences created without any references at all. Pointless stub. No proof of notability. Dream Focus 06:08, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Keep. Going by what I can read, Crab rangoon is wrapped in wonton, Crab puff is dipped in batter - those are not the same thing. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:17, 27 March 2013 (UTC) (Changed to "Keep" after seeing sources added by The Bushranger - there do appear to be plenty of suitable GHits -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:57, 27 March 2013 (UTC))[reply]
Yeah, they aren't the same thing pbp 06:28, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No evidence of notability. --Guy Macon (talk) 06:39, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - After looking this over and some Google poking about, this looks like it should be notable enough for its own article - but it does need work. However AfD is not for cleanup. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:41, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • References added; also gNews hits. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:50, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep per WP:HEY, thanks to excellent work of sourcing by The Bushranger. Weak because, if I haven't missed something, the sources basically are just collection of recipes. Keep because however the dish was covered in a good number of reliable publications. Frankly, given it has not too many chances to be expanded in a meaningful way I would prefer merging and redirecting the content somewhere, but in lack of a definite target I'm leaning to keep the article for now. Cavarrone (talk) 08:06, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: A crab puff and a crab rangoon is not the same thing. The whole basis for the nomination is thus invalid.--Milowent • hasspoken 12:52, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Crab_puff&oldid=1086370041"